
|
3. Dimorphic (Mosaic)-two theories exist about the evolution of the Dimorphic factor in canaries; 1. That it is carried over from the original wild canary and that the hybridization with the Red Siskin helped to emphasize it and make it more noticeable, 2. That it is a factor directly inherited from the Red Siskin. My opinion is that it is a characteristic that has been amalgamated from many sources, the faint dimorphism from the wild canary emphasized through an inheritance of European serins crossed with Gloster canaries which do have very marked dimorphism further emphasized by the color contrast afforded by the Red Siskin.
The specific elected points of dimorphism are limited and predetermined by sexual difference.
The denomination Mosaic although semantically incorrect is almost always used to identify the dimorphic factor. Dimorphics are of two types, Type I for females. the specified points manifestation are daintier and less evident. Type II are males with larger and more intensive markings at the expression points. |
|
Preferably the election points (points where lipochrome is concentrated) should have no frosting or as little as possible on the other hand the chest area should be veiled but observable in coloration. With Dimorphics the most important consideration is contrast and delimitation of election points.
|
|
In dimorphics the lipochrome pigment is limited to the central third of the feathers, this causes the overlaid arrangement to conceal the coloration and the bird appears of a chalky white colour. In the election points, the expression of color is entirely evident and with maximum saturation of lipochrome. |



|
Copyright © 2004 All rights reserved DERECHOS RESERVADOS |
|
Suggestions:
|



